Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746079

--- Comment #5 from James Laska <jla...@redhat.com> 2011-10-27 10:41:00 EDT ---
Created attachment 530506
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=530506
rubygem-grit.spec

(In reply to comment #4)
> Thank you James... I've address the issue raised in comment 3. Updates found 
> in
> path "/V2"
> 
> NOTE: The originals are still available in the original URLS.
> 
> Spec URL:
> http://joev.fedorapeople.org/V2/rubygem-grit.spec
> 
> SRPM URL:
> http://joev.fedorapeople.org/V2/rubygem-grit-2.4.1-1.fc15.src.rpm

Minor note, some reviewers suggest that you bump the %release (with and
appropriate %changelog entry) anytime a packaging change is made (even prior to
review).  This always feels weird for packages that aren't yet approved, but
just thought I'd mention it for future package reviews (refer to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Changelogs).

[ OK ] The updated package/spec addresses the missing LICENSE file.  rpmlint
output looks good.

[FAIL] The grit-2.4.1.gem included in the src.rpm payload no longer matches
upstream.  I'm not sure why, confirm how you are generating your src.rpm.

  # md5sum grit-*.gem*
  c8bee515d6eace9aec7336e0ac6b0768  grit-2.4.1.gem.downstream # included in
src.rpm
  d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e  grit-2.4.1.gem.upstream   # from Source0

[WARN] I've patched your spec file to address some of the style warnings I
posted in comment#2.  I'd suggest reviewing the changes and taking them if you
have no concerns.  Feel free to question/debate/discuss (see attached diff).

Please update the packages/spec to address the two points above, and we can
proceed from there.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to