Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719757 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts <ti...@math.uh.edu> 2011-11-04 19:05:54 EDT --- Just wanted to be sure that everyone's aware that the license tag reflects what's in the binary package. So if you had a bunch of LGPLv2+ code and a single GPLv2+ file was compiled together with it to make a binary, the resulting binary is simply GPLv2+ and if that's all you had in the resulting package, the license tag would simply show GPLv2+. Or, to put it another way, it looks like "newpolka/mf_qsort.c and ppl/*" refer to files in the source package, not the resulting binary package, and thus aren't terribly relevant to what goes in the License tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
