Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=752223

Pavel Simerda <pav...@pavlix.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Attachment #532587|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |

--- Comment #24 from Pavel Simerda <pav...@pavlix.net> 2011-11-09 16:46:21 EST 
---
Created attachment 532682
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=532682
SRPM with shorter rpmlint output

I improved the specfile to get rid of some rpmlint messages on the binary. I'd
glady take some advice on the rest of the messages.

$ rpmlint RPMS/i686/racoon2-20100526a-8.fc15.i686.rpm  
racoon2.i686: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/racoon2/hook/functions
racoon2.i686: E: non-executable-script /etc/racoon2/hook/functions 0644L
/bin/sh
racoon2.i686: E: non-readable /etc/racoon2/transport_ike.conf 0600L
racoon2.i686: E: non-readable /etc/racoon2/racoon2.conf 0600L
racoon2.i686: E: non-readable /etc/racoon2/vals.conf 0600L
racoon2.i686: E: non-readable /etc/racoon2/tunnel_ike.conf 0600L
racoon2.i686: E: non-readable /etc/racoon2/local-test.conf 0600L
racoon2.i686: E: non-readable /etc/racoon2/tunnel_ike_natt.conf 0600L
racoon2.i686: E: non-readable /etc/racoon2/transport_kink.conf 0600L
racoon2.i686: E: non-readable /etc/racoon2/default.conf 0600L
racoon2.i686: E: non-readable /etc/racoon2/tunnel_kink.conf 0600L
racoon2.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary iked
racoon2.i686: W: dangerous-command-in-%post chmod
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 10 errors, 3 warnings.

I guess Racoon2 authors made the config files non-world-readable intentinally.
Non-executable "script" could be patched if needed. The chmod is probably
necessary.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to