Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754185 Kalev Lember <kalevlem...@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kalevlem...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember <kalevlem...@gmail.com> 2011-11-15 15:24:53 EST --- Good work with packaging it up! One thing I'd change here is the source package name. Right now Fedora only has the 32 bit MinGW cross toolchain, but we're planning to also add the 64 bit toolchain support in the future. The way it's planned is that there would be one source package, producing separate 32 bit and 64 bit binary rpms. Because of that, the current MinGW guidelines suggest that newly imported packages should name the source package with the mingw- prefix, so you'd have mingw-p11-kit srpm producing mingw32-p11-kit binary rpm: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW#Example_Specfile -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
