Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744339

--- Comment #18 from Richard Shaw <hobbes1...@gmail.com> 2011-11-16 18:44:43 
EST ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> ad 2)  I have checked difference between COPYING, NOTES and README files under
> libdieharder/ directory
> and the top level directory and it seems to me like that COPYING, NOTES and
> README files under libdieharder/ directory are just older versions of the 
> files
> in the top level.

That may be, but one thing I noticed when doing a diff of the two COPYING
files:
$ diff -u COPYING libdieharder/COPYING 
--- COPYING 2011-10-14 08:41:37.000000000 -0500
+++ libdieharder/COPYING 2011-10-14 08:41:37.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
-$Id: COPYING 215 2006-07-25 18:57:50Z rgb $
+$Id: COPYING 221 2006-08-16 22:43:03Z rgb $

 License is granted to build or use the accompanying software:

-                           dieharder
+                           libdieharder

 according to the following standard Gnu General Public License or any
 later versions, with the one minor "Beverage" modification listed below.
---
The files specifically callout dieharder and libdieharder. I'm not familiar
enough with the legalease of software licenses but the safest thing to do is
how I set things up in my spec. Hopefully the developer will clarify.

As far as the manual goes, since it has instructions for the binary, I would
keep it in the main package.

I think you're pretty much done, just change the documentation as necessary
depending on what the developer says. I already did the review but it's on my
work computer so instead of doing it all over again I'll approve your package
first thing in the morning!

Richard

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to