Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755093 --- Comment #13 from Matthew Garrett <m...@redhat.com> 2011-11-22 11:59:24 EST --- I'll try to work out what the symlink behaviour is tomorrow. I'm not convinced that skipping blessing is going to work in all cases - I'll take a look at the OS X partitions to see whether they're blessed or not. It may be that there's fallback code to run boot.efi in the absence of blessing, and in your case that would potentially indicate that the blessing isn't happening at all - I could believe that the bootloader wouldn't follow the symlink, but the bless code does and would be picking up the inode of the target rather than the link itself. Could you do dd if=/dev/sdwhatever bs=1 skip=$((0x400)) count=$((0x100)) | hexdump -C on your /boot/efi partition and attach the output? And can you also check whether having it be on FAT is sufficient to make Startup Drive recognise it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
