Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696

--- Comment #100 from Brett Lentz <ble...@redhat.com> 2011-12-01 09:12:15 EST 
---
I've got a couple patches that I'm pushing the Boost folks to merge. I'm still
unravelling the stack trace exception patch into something workable. 

Discussion on EINTR patch:
http://marc.info/?t=132269010900002&r=1&w=2\

Discussion on configurable stack size patch:
http://marc.info/?t=132266986500004&r=1&w=2

Hongli - If you have a moment to take a look at the discussion around your
EINTR modifications. According to the Boost folks, POSIX specifically forbids
pthreads from returning EINTR. You already mentioned that this happened on a
customer's system in production, do you recall what OS it was?

It might make that particular patch a bit more palatable if we can couch it in
some ifdefs, so that it's only necessary on the broken platform. 

Additionally, it might allow us to file a bug with the upstream OS if the
behavior still exists.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to