Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719854 --- Comment #34 from Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com> 2011-12-07 10:14:55 EST --- (In reply to comment #33) > Hi, Vít, > > thanks for the explanation. I admit that I'm not a ruby geek ;-) I did the > change in this latest version because of comment 28. What you suggest now is > what I did before. Personally I have a slight preference for the original > approach because it is simpler, I have no problem to roll back. Let me know. Sorry for the confusion. In comment 28, I just tried to point out that Shawn was not right, that the guideline is clear, but I apparently achieved the opposite effect ;) > About upgrading: this was discussed earlier in this thread already. I agree > that it is a good idea to ping the original author to get an updated package. > For the time being though this one seems to be the best we can do. It's needed > for OpenNebula. Not an issue. It was just note. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
