Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760645

--- Comment #9 from Fabien Archambault <marbolan...@gmail.com> 2011-12-13 
04:02:17 EST ---
Hello,

Sorry for the delay to answer.

@Jussi Lehtola: I will take a look at your spec version to see if there are
some things I can add or modify.
Concerning my use of ergo, I was asked to compile it on a cluster where users
will have to use it so I will have to follow updates and improvements in the
package. If your question was about following the package.
Using it on the computer is not yet an objective for me but I have some
colleagues who should be interested to install it on there computer to run some
small single points before going to cluster or smp calculations.
I know this is a very specific package but it is at the same level as mpqc or
cp2k which are already within the repositories. I believe adding it to Fedora
and CentOS is a way for such a package to be found and used.

For the sponsoring, I made one informal review (see:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760897). It was an easy, I will
make another one soon.
I am also working on another package (psicode also named psi3) still related to
quantum chemistry but I have an issue with upstream not replying to my
emails...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to