Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769002 --- Comment #3 from Simon Schampijer <si...@schampijer.de> 2011-12-21 03:53:43 EST --- Ok, the 'incorrect-fsf-address' was new to me. The address seem to be wrong in all of the files of the sugar-toolkit, not just the ones that rpmlint reports. Looking at FilesCheck.py in rpmlint the detecting of this error is not as robust. The reg expression "fsf_license_regex = re.compile('(GNU((\s+(Library|Lesser|Affero))?(\s+General)?\s+Public|\s+Free\s+Documentation)\s+Licen[cs]e|(GP|FD)L)', re.IGNORECASE)" does not handle newlines and it seems to be very common that "GNU Lesser General Public License" is not written on one line (maybe that is one of the reasons why many sources still have the old address?). Besides that: so the policy is to update all of the sources to the new address "51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA."? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
