Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721179

--- Comment #30 from Shawn Starr <shawn.st...@rogers.com> 2012-01-03 13:24:01 
EST ---
Good idea on rpmlint for .spec file itself:

1) Fixed noise in comments
2) Removed sitearch macro altogether, this rubygem has no DSOs
3) Replace SOURCE0 URL with new location - URL also is valid.
4) Don't delete VERSION and keep it with the package for consistency mark as a
%doc file -> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/extlib-0.9.15/VERSION


Spec URL: http://www.sh0n.net/spstarr/fedora/rubygem-extlib/rubygem-extlib.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.sh0n.net/spstarr/fedora/rubygem-extlib/rubygem-extlib-0.9.15-3.fc17.src.rpm

rpmlint: PASS (with usual ruby doc warnings) RPMs
rpmlint: PASS .spec file

mock build: PASS

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to