Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759941 Mattia Verga <mattia.ve...@tiscali.it> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Mattia Verga <mattia.ve...@tiscali.it> 2012-01-08 07:50:13 EST --- - rpmlint checks return: spatialite-gui.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary spatialite_gui 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Warning can be ignored: OK - naming guidelines and .spec file name: OK - packaging guidelines: OK - license: OK (GPLv3), in %doc - spec file legible, in am. english: OK - source matches upstream: OK - package compiles on (i686/x86_64): OK + Build Requires / Requires: NOTE 1 - no locales - no libraries - not relocatable - no directories created - no duplicate files - file permissions: OK - macros: OK - code/content: OK - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no headers / no need for -devel - .desktop file: OK - ownership: OK - filenames: OK NOTES: -------------- 1: The required packages are automatically added by rpm, however I'm thinking about the opportunity to specify a 'require: libspatialite', since this package has no functionality without it. What do you think? That is not a blocker, so I mark this as APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
