Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771111 --- Comment #15 from Ofer Schreiber <oschr...@redhat.com> 2012-01-09 10:22:06 EST --- Official tarball is now available: http://www.ovirt.org/releases/stable/binary/ovirt-engine-sdk-1.0-1.tar.gz SRPM: http://oschreib.fedorapeople.org/ovirt-engine-sdk/ovirt-engine-sdk-1.0-1.fc16.src.rpm SPEC: http://oschreib.fedorapeople.org/ovirt-engine-sdk/ovirt-engine-sdk.spec Now, about the release/version: I'm not sure I completely understood the convention. 1. Should the rpm version/release match the upstream one? 2. If I'll name it 0.0-2.20120104git9e88d7e%{dist} should I update the changelog accordingly? #2 is a bit problematic since the upstream already contains the spec file, so I'll have to commit it after every build I'll do for this review. I thought it would be better to first pass this review with the right version (e.g. 1.0-1) and then add updates to the changelog. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
