Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768174 --- Comment #18 from Pierre-YvesChibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> 2012-01-15 16:36:29 EST --- (In reply to comment #17) > [!]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the > license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the > license(s) for the package is included in %doc. > > -> Corrected, %doc added to the LICENSE path This is actually a mistake on my side, I corrected the output above but missed in the "Issues" section. Since the LICENSE file is in the %{_docdir} it does not have to be tagged as %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
