Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857 --- Comment #27 from John D. Ramsdell <ramsd...@mitre.org> 2012-01-17 14:52:46 EST --- (In reply to comment #25) I'm making progress addressing the rpm errors you identified, however, I'm baffled by two of the errors: incorrect-fsf-address and no-dependency-on. I tried to find them in: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues but they are not documented there. Where should I look? I googled with "site:fedoraproject.org rpmlint incorrect-fsf-address" and did not get a definitive answer. I also tried "site:fedoraproject.org rpmlint" but that didn't seem to help. Here is the rpmlint I generate right now: $ rpmlint datalog-1.7-3.fc16.x86_64.rpm datalog.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Datalog datalog.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/lua/5.1/datalog.lua datalog.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/datalog-1.7/COPYING.LIB datalog.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary datalog 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint datalog-devel-1.7-3.fc16.x86_64.rpm datalog-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on datalog/datalog-libs/libdatalog datalog-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ I will add a manual page to datalog-1.8 when the package is updated to use Lua 5.2. As to the missing devel documentation, the API is documented in the info file distributed in the main package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
