Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783317 Radek Novacek <rnova...@redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |rnova...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org |rnova...@redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Radek Novacek <rnova...@redhat.com> 2012-01-20 06:27:34 EST --- Name: ok License: ok Source: It should be stated clearly in the comment in specfile how can be the tarball obtained from git BRs/Reqs: see below Macros used consistently: ok ldconfig: ok Desktop file validations: NA Locales: NA Docs: install at least README to %doc. According to guidelines you should also ping upstream to add license to tarball. Devel: ok Files: ok Build: ok rpmlint: no need to fix ./akonadi-google.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: akonadi-google-0.2-git754771b.tar.gz akonadi-google-calendar.x86_64: W: no-documentation akonadi-google-calendar.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary akonadi_googlecalendar_resource akonadi-google-contacts.x86_64: W: no-documentation akonadi-google-contacts.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary akonadi_googlecontacts_resource akonadi-google-tasks.x86_64: W: no-documentation akonadi-google-tasks.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary akonadi_googletasks_resource libkgoogle-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) akonadi -> Kodiak libkgoogle-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) google -> Google, goggle, googly libkgoogle-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US akonadi -> Kodiak libkgoogle-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US google -> Google, goggle, googly libkgoogle-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation I have some comments to subpackages, its only my recommendations, I'm open to other suggestions: * contacts, calendar and tasks subpackage should Require: libkgoogle subpackage with same version to prevent breakage on API/ABI change * I would let the base package empty and add Requires to all subpackages (except devel). This makes it easier for user to install all of them at once. Add section %files without any content to generate base package too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
