Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740160 --- Comment #15 from Martin Gieseking <martin.giesek...@uos.de> 2012-01-24 14:37:18 EST --- The renaming of /usr/bin/markdown to /usr/bin/markdown_py simplifies things a bit. However, python-markdown 2.1.0 was only pushed to rawhide (F17). The current release branches still provide 2.0.3. Thus, if you want to build discount for Fedora < 17 as well, you might want to ask the maintainer of python-markdown whether it's possible to safely rename the binary. Since python-markdown is required by a couple of critical packages (e.g. bodhi-server, transifex) it's probably not a good idea to update to 2.1.0 in F16. Concerning the demo programs, I think the prefixed names discount-* are fine. I'll have a closer look at your SRPM in the next couple of days. Currently, I'm too busy. Just a quick note: You should not add files more than once, so drop the %doc files from the base package. They are installed by its dependency libmarkdown. If you don't have a sponsor yet, I can sponsor you. But I would like you to do some informal reviews to show a basic understanding of the packaging and review guidelines. Just pick a yet uncommented review request (one that's not blocked by FE-NEEDSPONSOR) from the review queue [1], check the items from list [2], and post your comments into the bug ticket. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
