Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785371 --- Comment #16 from Alec Leamas <leamas.a...@gmail.com> 2012-02-03 06:01:24 EST --- I was to quick. From the list discussion, there are one or two more bundled libs. The src/modules/simu/simuv2.1/SOLID-2.0 lib is clear, it should be packaged separately. Since it doesn't exist in Fedora today, I suggest that you make a new request for this package, blocking this one. Note that qhull, which SOLID possibly depends on, exists in Fedora (v 2003.1). In my eyes, the pasted part of a header file in src/libs/tgf/tgf.h is not a bundled library. BTW, the upstream discussion describes this as "Fedora's law". But it's also Debian's law, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries (links at at the very end). Since repackaging the SOLID-2 library should mean exactly the same code as today, besides build system patches, maybe something is possible? Note that the library can still be part of the source, just the system variant is used if it exists. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
