Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787878

Kalev Lember <kalevlem...@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fedora-mingw@lists.fedorapr
                   |                            |oject.org,
                   |                            |kalevlem...@gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from Kalev Lember <kalevlem...@gmail.com> 2012-02-06 19:21:17 
EST ---
I believe it would be better to name the source package mingw-icu, like in the
example spec file:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW#Example_Specfile

We are likely to get 64 bit MinGW cross compiler in the future, and naming the
source package mingw-icu would help with the transition. That way we'll be able
to produce mingw32-icu + mingw64-icu binary packages from a single mingw-icu
source package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to