Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782560 --- Comment #15 from Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda <bkab...@redhat.com> 2012-02-20 01:52:04 EST --- (In reply to comment #14) > I updated the spec file to do prep/build/install more in line with the draft > guidelines (minus the typos in the draft that make it fail). > > I gave up on el5, as rubygems there is a bit too old. but this should work on > el6 and any supported fedora releases. If we could update rubygems just a > little on el5, it'd work there too. > > Spec file: http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/specs/rubygem-ruby-shadow.spec The process of creating the new guidelines is still going on. The ruby-sig people are mostly arguing against the unpacking and then repacking the gem, as it is an unnecessary payload. If you don't need to patch the C extension, this really just makes the spec longer and harder to read. I suggest getting rid of it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
