Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790553 --- Comment #4 from Juan Hernández <juan.hernan...@redhat.com> 2012-02-22 02:52:45 EST --- Thanks for the review David. I fixed the lincense description. I am not 100% sure the version should be 0. Take into account that the source is checked from a tag in the upstream repository named "xsom-20110809". That date is not the date of the checkout but the name of the tag. In addition the original POM file from the upstream repository contains the following: <groupId>com.sun.xsom</groupId> <artifactId>xsom</artifactId> <name>XSOM</name> <version>20110809</version> Apparently the upstream developers use that date to identify the version. However, not been 100% sure, I prepared two updated versions of the package, one with the license fixed but still using the date as version: http://jhernand.fedorapeople.org/rpms/xsom/3 The other one with the license fixed and moving the date to the release: http://jhernand.fedorapeople.org/rpms/xsom/0-3.20110809svn Let me know which one do you want to move forward. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
