Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730306 --- Comment #11 from Richard Fontana <rfont...@redhat.com> 2012-03-12 08:10:14 EDT --- I confirm that the best license tag here is "CDDL or GPLv2 with exceptions". Putting license information in the source file headers is, to my knowledge, not a Fedora packaging or legal requirement. The inclusion of the Apache License 2.0 may not be necessary and will be investigated upstream. However, it is not necessarily in conflict with the CDDL/GPLv2 license designation, and therefore should not be a packaging obstacle IMO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
