Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798998 Michael Schwendt <mschwe...@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org |mschwe...@gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt <mschwe...@gmail.com> 2012-03-20 07:19:41 EDT --- * Release 0.0.5 fixes the licensing issues and explicitly acknowledges the tri-license in the README even. * New file src/lib/CDRColorProfiles.h uses the compatible zlib/libpng "no acknowledgement" license. * Please add V=1 to the Make invocation for more verbose build output. * The pkgconfig file is worse in release 0.0.5. It explicitly adds a dependency on libraries that are linked with libcdr already. In 0.0.5 it has added a dependency on lcms2 and zlib in "Requires" and/or "Libs". Whereas libwpd* and libwpg headers are included from within libcdr headers at least (and the pkgconfig dependency can help with getting their custom include path right), relinking with lcms2 and zlib would not be necessary. * APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
