Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806557 --- Comment #6 from Praveen Kumar <kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com> 2012-03-25 05:06:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #3) > > I think then for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806299 also > > obsoletes should be %{pkgname} < 0.7-4 ? (because we have to Obsolete > > anything > > that is lower than the bumped release of the renamed package) > You're right, I missed that. > > I'm just curious, where did you get that about obsolete: (I made the same > error, so I guess, we had the same reference, and I'd like to correct the > reference.) Well I got that right information from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bkabrda/Django_rename#Django-foo but I interpreted it wrongly, when you pointed out I looked again and found out I made same mistake in previous request. I think reference is correct, we took it a wrong way. (In reply to comment #4) >One real issue: >You should remove bundled .egg-info in prep-section >rm -rf django_followit.egg-info >(cf. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python_Eggs#Upstream_Eggs) According to reference if egg-info contain any pre-compiled bytecode then we have to remove it but here it's only contain package information files, do we have to remove those also? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
