Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar <ppi...@redhat.com> 2012-04-05 02:43:41 EDT --- This package is licensed as (GPL+ or Artistic) despite the COPYING file is GPLv3 copy. Thus spake upstream: From: David Golden <dagol...@cpan.org> To: Petr Pisar <ppi...@redhat.com> Subject: Re: Test::Report lincense The COPYING file is incorrect. The license is Artistic 1 or GPL 1 (or later GPL). David On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Petr Pisar <ppi...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I have a question regarding Test-Report-1.58 license. The lib/Test/Reporter.pm > POD states: > > This is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under > the same terms as the Perl 5 programming language system itself. > > and LICENSE file confirms it: > > Terms of the Perl programming language system itself > a) the GNU General Public License as published by the Free > Software Foundation; either version 1, or (at your option) any > later version, or > b) the "Artistic License" > > But the distributed COPYING file quotes GPLv3 license. > > It's confusing for me. Is Test-Report licensed as (GPLv1+ or Artistic) or > (GPLv3+ or Artistic)? > > -- Petr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
