Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772406 --- Comment #11 from Thomas Spura <toms...@fedoraproject.org> 2012-04-07 14:43:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > thanks for your comments. I've contacted the vendor via direct mail couple > of > days ago and wait his reply. I'm not sure if packing the SVN version is good > idea. From the use so far i did with 1.1 version on SL5 i didn't see any > sigsegv (yet). Sometimes it's needed, but as you are seemingly using it quite a lot, using 1.1 might be fine too... Lets wait a bit for an answer, till we simply move along... > A question regarding grouping, i don't see this as development tool, i > actually use it on the administrating side thus the current group, do insist > on > changing it? Is there any guide on what fits where that i should check? I know no guide so far. Just pick a reasonable one from /usr/share/doc/rpm-*/GROUPS. Hmm, and you are using it there to limit the cpuusage of vi? Or why the "/Text". e.g. "Applications/System" makes more sense for me, when you think Devel/Tools is wrong... More other examples at: $ repoquery --qf '%{group} %{name}' -a | sort | grep "Applications/System" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
