Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: pcsc-cyberjack - driver for ReinerSCT cyberJack 
chipcart readers

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811330

           Summary: Review Request: pcsc-cyberjack - driver for ReinerSCT
                    cyberJack chipcart readers
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: p...@redhat.com
         QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
                CC: nott...@redhat.com,
                    package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
    Classification: Fedora
      Story Points: ---
              Type: ---
        Regression: ---
        Mount Type: ---
     Documentation: ---


Spec URL: http://pcfe.net/pcsc-cyberjack-3.99.5final.SP03/pcsc-cyberjack.spec
SRPM URL:
http://pcfe.net/pcsc-cyberjack-3.99.5final.SP03/pcsc-cyberjack-3.99.5final.SP03-5.fc16.src.rpm
Description: 
This is the current driver for ReinerSCT chipcard readers

the vendor switched from ctapi to pcsc (dropping ctapi support completely as
far as I can tell) and this causes some confusion, I think I got everything
right but this package definitely needs more eyeballs.

Until fox is in Fedora (and I'm not sure the license exceptions will make this
possible), the package needs building 'withGUI 0'. AFAICT the GUI components
are just a nice to have but not a functional requirement.

I only use my reader very sparingly, in bug 767657 another user reported
partial success.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to