Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812573 --- Comment #10 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl> 2012-04-23 18:10:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Erik, where did the numbers for the obsoletes come from? The testing repo has: > mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-good-static-0.10.30-4.fc17_cross.noarch.rpm > mingw64-gstreamer-plugins-good-static-0.10.30-4.fc17_cross.noarch.rpm > > ... so the obsoletes should be: > Obsoletes: mingw32-gstreamer-plugins-good-static < 0.10.30-5 > Obsoletes: mingw64-gstreamer-plugins-good-static < 0.10.30-5 I took the version numbers from the srpm which was initially mentioned in this review ticket. But you're correct, using the version number from the testing repo should be good enough as there shouldn't be any binary rpms of the 0.10.30-5 package (the initial srpm in this review ticket) publicly available -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
