Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723779 --- Comment #5 from Guido Grazioli <guido.grazi...@gmail.com> 2012-04-29 05:07:29 EDT --- Thanks, and sorry for the broken links. >> %package util >> Summary: Javadocs for %{name} >> Group: Documentation >> >> %description util >> This package provides additional java utility classes for %{name}. > > Wrong Group tag for those contents. Good find, fixed both Group and Summary, and also improved a bit on description. >> %package javadoc >> Summary: Javadocs for %{name} >> Group: Documentation >> Requires: jpackage-utils > > What in this generated HTML documentation package requires jpackage-utils? This is a requirement that has always been in Java guidelines (fragment above was copy&pasted directly from ant template[1]). Not sure but I think main reason is that jpackage-utils owns the /usr/share/javadoc directory. Spec URL: http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/lwjgl/lwjgl.spec SRPM URL: http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/lwjgl/lwjgl-2.7.1-3.fc18.src.rpm [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#ant_2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
