Hi,

how should it be fixed for glusterfs now? Better shell code without
bashishm or do you want /bin/bash as shebang?



-------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
Betreff:        Bug#873878: glusterfs-client: mount.glusterfs needs bash as
/bin/sh
Weitersenden-Datum:     Thu, 31 Aug 2017 20:21:01 +0000
Weitersenden-Von:       Michael Lundkvist <brels.deb...@solske.net>
Weitersenden-An:        debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org
Weitersenden-CC:        Patrick Matthäi <pmatth...@debian.org>
Datum:  Thu, 31 Aug 2017 21:46:18 +0200
Von:    Michael Lundkvist <brels.deb...@solske.net>
Antwort an:     Michael Lundkvist <brels.deb...@solske.net>,
873...@bugs.debian.org
An:     Debian Bug Tracking System <sub...@bugs.debian.org>



Package: glusterfs-client
Version: 3.12.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: Policy 10.4

Version 3.12 of Glusterfs adds code in /sbin/mount.glusterfs that depends on 
bash.

With dash as /bin/sh, I get the following error message when trying to mount a 
glusterfs volume:
> /sbin/mount.glusterfs: 667: /sbin/mount.glusterfs: Bad substitution

Line 667 is:
    667             [ ${volume_str:0:1} = '/' ] && {

Modifying mount.glusterfs to use /bin/bash makes it possible to mount again.

/Micke


-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.12.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages glusterfs-client depends on:
ii  fuse              2.9.7-1
ii  glusterfs-common  3.12.0-1
ii  libc6             2.24-17
ii  libssl1.1         1.1.0f-5
ii  python            2.7.13-2

glusterfs-client recommends no packages.

glusterfs-client suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

_______________________________________________
packaging mailing list
packaging@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging

Reply via email to