On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 02:31:45PM -0500, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
> On 01/23/2018 07:51 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 11:56:04AM +0100, Niels de Vos wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 12:22:37PM -0500, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
> >>> On 01/20/2018 08:32 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> >>>> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 11:55:33AM +0000, jenk...@build.gluster.org 
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> SRC: 
> >>>>> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/38/artifact/glusterfs-3.13.2.tar.gz
> >>>>> HASH: 
> >>>>> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/38/artifact/glusterfs-3.13.2.sha512sum
> >>>>
> >>>> Packages for CentOS 6 and 7 have been built and will become available in
> >>>> the testing repository within the next few hours. Please test and let me
> >>>> know when they can be marked for release.
> >>>>
> >>>>   # yum install centos-release-gluster313
> >>>>   # yum --enablerepo=centos-gluster313-test install glusterfs-server
> >>>
> >>> There seems to be a problem with our userspace-rcu dependency. As
> >>> follows, if this package is updated, we get into the following
> >>> dependency issue.
> >>>
> >>> Niels, is there a way to get this corrected?
> >>>
> >>> ---> Package userspace-rcu.x86_64 0:0.7.16-3.el7 will be updated
> >>> --> Processing Dependency: liburcu-bp.so.1()(64bit) for package:
> >>> glusterfs-server-3.13.2-1.el7.x86_64
> >>> --> Processing Dependency: liburcu-cds.so.1()(64bit) for package:
> >>> glusterfs-server-3.13.2-1.el7.x86_64
> >>> ---> Package userspace-rcu.x86_64 0:0.10.0-3.el7 will be an update
> >>> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> >>> Error: Package: glusterfs-server-3.13.2-1.el7.x86_64
> >>> (@centos-gluster313-test)
> >>>            Requires: liburcu-bp.so.1()(64bit)
> >>>            Removing: userspace-rcu-0.7.16-3.el7.x86_64 
> >>> (@centos-gluster310)
> >>>                liburcu-bp.so.1()(64bit)
> >>>            Updated By: userspace-rcu-0.10.0-3.el7.x86_64 
> >>> (centos-gluster313)
> >>>               ~liburcu-bp.so.6()(64bit)
> >>> Error: Package: glusterfs-server-3.13.2-1.el7.x86_64
> >>> (@centos-gluster313-test)
> >>>            Requires: liburcu-cds.so.1()(64bit)
> >>>            Removing: userspace-rcu-0.7.16-3.el7.x86_64 
> >>> (@centos-gluster310)
> >>>                liburcu-cds.so.1()(64bit)
> >>>            Updated By: userspace-rcu-0.10.0-3.el7.x86_64 
> >>> (centos-gluster313)
> >>>               ~liburcu-cds.so.6()(64bit)
> >>
> >> It seems that the glusterfs-3.13 packages got built against
> >> userspace-rcu-0.7 and not the newer 0.10 version. There seems to have
> >> been some kind of build-override in the
> >> storage7-gluster-common-candidate tag, removing the 0.7 version from
> >> there made the 0.10 version available for glusterfs-3.13.
> >>
> >> Next steps:
> >> - rebuild glusterfs-3.13.2
> >> - verify none of the other versions that require 0.7 have been broken
> >>
> >> Note that it might have been possible that others can install
> >> glusterfs-3.13.x when EPEL is enabled. Fedora EPEL provides a (possibly
> >> and surely untested) compatible older version of userspace-rcu. Also,
> >> userspace-rcu was only updated in CentOS-7 for ppc64le/aarch64 fixes,
> >> these architectures are not available for CentOS-6.
> > 
> > Packages are available now, please run your test again when you have the
> > time. The YUM metadata will need to get updated, so you may need to
> > clean that first:
> > 
> >   # yum -y --enablerepo=centos-gluster313-test clean all
> 
> Tested, and works fine. Thanks for the rebuild.
> 
> So, for CentOS6 the RPM version is still 3.13.2-1 and is bumped for
> CentOS7 only? As I tested on CentOS6 as well this time, and found only
> the 1 version available, hence asking.

Yes, that is correct. No change was needed for CentOS-6.

Thanks for testing, the builds are now marked for release to the
mirrors. The packages will likely become available during the day
tomorrow.

Niels
_______________________________________________
packaging mailing list
packaging@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging

Reply via email to