My initial thoughts were that it could be an issue with static versus dynamic 
NAT, if only one connection is established there is a 1:1 relationship and no 
extended translation is required.  If a second is established a 
many-to-one/dynamic translation is required and I was thinking the associated 
GRE traffic might be mismatched and then dropped.

-----
PS you might find it of interest to read up on NAT Traversal - its used to 
solve the  issue you describe above.

Cheers,

Mark



On 5 Jan 2012, at 15:56, "Stewart MacDonald" <stew...@macdonald.com> wrote:

> Happy 2012!
>
> We have Packetfence in the office and love it, but we're experiencing one 
> (minor) quirk and I am wondering whether anybody else has experienced it or 
> sees the same thing.
>
> We have a remote location which uses PPTP -- a little weak, I know -- for 
> mobile user vpn access.  The PPTP service is reliable and works as expected, 
> here is the quirk:
>
> If we establish one concurrent vpn connection we don't encounter any issues, 
> the user can authenticate and connect with no issues.  If we establish a 
> second, though, it initiates a connection but never authenticates.  If we run 
> the same test from in front Packetfence there are no issues.  The logs do not 
> show any errors.
>
> My initial thoughts were that it could be an issue with static versus dynamic 
> NAT, if only one connection is established there is a 1:1 relationship and no 
> extended translation is required.  If a second is established a 
> many-to-one/dynamic translation is required and I was thinking the associated 
> GRE traffic might be mismatched and then dropped.
>
> Has anyone seen anything similar?  At the end of the day we're hoping to get 
> rid of PPTP entirely but hold on to it for a handful of legacy users which 
> have XP.  We also support a few clients which supply PPTP accounts to our 
> technical support staff.
>
> Warm regards,
> Stewart
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
> infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
> virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual
> desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure
> costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
> _______________________________________________
> Packetfence-users mailing list
> Packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Nuffield College is a Registered Charity No. 1137506. Registered Office: 
Nuffield College, New Road, Oxford, OX1 1NF

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual 
desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure 
costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
_______________________________________________
Packetfence-users mailing list
Packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to