Hi Rich,

What about:
Dashboard -> Reports -> Active

On 12-03-06 2:54 PM, Rich Graves wrote:
> I see that node search (a front end for ~pf/bin/pfcmd node view) does
> not let you search by IP address. The shortest path I see from a
> complaint about an IP address to a violation is:
>
> Status => ip - mac history => (search) => click on mac address =>
> carefully hover to display the hidden actions => violation, etc
>
> That's a lot of clicks for a common operation. Am I missing something? I
> understand that IP addresses can be reused, but "most recent" is usually
> the one I'm looking for, and the node lookup screen shows enough IP
> history to be sure.
> --
> Rich Graves http://claimid.com/rcgraves
> Carleton.edu Sr UNIX and Security Admin
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
> The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
> is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
> Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Packetfence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users


-- 
Francois Gaudreault, ing. jr
[email protected]  ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x130) ::  www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(www.packetfence.org)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
_______________________________________________
Packetfence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to