Good morning.

We are seeing this regularly in our packetfence log, and wonder how to
resolve.  I am unsure if it is actually causing issues with our users.

Mar 25 10:42:13 httpd.aaa(28070) INFO: [6c:88:14:xx:xx:xx] handling radius
autz request: from switch_ip => (10.1.49.6), connection_type =>
Wireless-802.11-EAP,switch_mac => (), mac => [6c:88:14:xx:xx:xx], port =>
13, username => "host/username.ad.davenport.edu" (pf::radius::authorize)
Mar 25 10:42:13 httpd.aaa(28070) INFO: person host/username.ad.davenport.edu
modified to host/username.ad.davenport.edu (pf::person::person_modify)
Mar 25 10:42:13 httpd.aaa(28070) INFO: autoregister a node that is already
registered, do nothing. (pf::node::node_register)
Mar 25 10:42:13 httpd.aaa(28070) INFO: Can't find provisioner for
6c:88:14:xx:xx:xx (pf::vlan::getNormalVlan)
Mar 25 10:42:13 httpd.aaa(28070) WARN: The year was past, null or
undefined. We used current year (pf::config::dynamic_unreg_date)
Mar 25 10:42:20 httpd.aaa(28070) ERROR: radius authorize failed with error:
The 'month' parameter (undef) to DateTime::new was an 'undef', which is not
one of the allowed types: scalar
 at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/DateTime.pm line 201
        DateTime::new(undef, 'year', 2015, 'month', undef, 'day', undef,
'time_zone', 'DateTime::TimeZone::America::Detroit=HASH(0xxxx)', ...)
called at /usr/local/pf/lib/pf/config.pm line 914
        pf::config::dynamic_unreg_date(undef) called at
/usr/local/pf/lib/pf/vlan.pm line 416
        pf::vlan::getNormalVlan('pf::vlan::custom=HASH(0xxxx)',
'pf::Switch::Cisco::WLC=HASH(0xxxx)', 13, '6c:88:14:xx:xx:xx',
'HASH(0xxxx)', 385, 'host/username.ad.davenport.edu', 'DU', 'HASH(0xxxx)',
...) called at /usr/local/pf/lib/pf/vlan.pm line 122
        pf::vlan::fetchVlanForNode('pf::vlan::custom=HASH(0xxxx)',
'6c:88:14:xx:xx:xx', 'pf::Switch::Cisco::WLC=HASH(0xxxx)', 13, 385, 'host/
username.ad.davenport.edu', 'DU', 'HASH(0xxxx)', undef, ...) called at
/usr/local/pf/lib/pf/radius.pm line 182
        pf::radius::authorize('pf::radius::custom=HASH(0xxxx)',
'HASH(0xxxx)') called at /usr/local/pf/lib/pf/api.pm line 61
        eval {...} called at /usr/local/pf/lib/pf/api.pm line 60
        pf::api::radius_authorize('pf::api', 'NAS-Port-Type',
'Wireless-802.11', 'Service-Type', 'Framed-User', 'Tunnel-Type', 'VLAN',
'Called-Station-Id', 'e8:ba:70:xx:xx:xx:DU', ...) called at
/usr/local/pf/lib/pf/WebAPI/MsgPack.pm line 61
        eval {...} called at /usr/local/pf/lib/pf/WebAPI/MsgPack.pm line 60
        pf::WebAPI::MsgPack::handler('pf::WebAPI::MsgPack=HASH(0xxxx)',
'Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0xxxx)') called at
/usr/local/pf/lib/pf/WebAPI.pm line 62
        pf::WebAPI::handler('Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0xxxx)') called at
-e line 0
        eval {...} called at -e line 0
 (pf::api::radius_authorize)


This is a wireless user connecting to an 802.1x network, with a backend
source of Active Directory.

I wonder if there's a PF, radius, or AD setting that needs to be tweaked.


-
Pete Hoffswell - Network Manager
[email protected]
http://www.davenport.edu
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to