Hi,

We are trying to set up a new Packetfence server and are having problems 
somewhere between the 'roles' and client Windows machine picking up a relevant 
IP address from the pf server.

AD is successfully added as a user source and there are basic rules added, the 
rule conditions are for AD group membership so if an AD user account is in a 
group which matches the rule then its assigned a role.

The Windows client becomes 'registered' and is put into a relevant role 
'GeneralStaff' for this situation.  In PacketFence within Network-Switches 
area, our Cisco switch has the 'Role by VLAN ID' = 'General Staff' and is 
configured for VLAN 55 (Registration).

So when I connect my laptop, it is registered and is put into the 
'GeneralStaff' role but I do not get an IP address associated with VLAN 55 
(infact I get a 169 IP address).

I can ping all the VLAN interfaces etc so network connectivity is fine and in 
Network - Interfaces&Switches the VLANs have been configured eg vlan55 
10.55.55.10 255.255.255.0 Registration. We are slightly confused why the 
packetfence does not give my laptop a VLAN 55 address?

Do we need to create separate DHCP scopes for each VLAN?

Thanks for any help you can provide in advance it would be very much 
appreciated.

Thanks
Stuart

Stuart McWatt
Senior Network and Infrastructure Analyst

Certas Energy UK Limited
Sheilling House
Glenbervie Business Park - Larbert - FK5 4RB
Phone : 01324 408040 - Mobile : 07500 559609
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

[cid:certas_76080deb-6dcc-42fd-a96d-7a823f6a7a45.gif][cid:safetyf1rst_50886216-b7ea-4c50-abc3-78998a1b9b88.gif]
  [cid:finalist-logo_c2180ca4-c389-40e0-a9d4-ca51ef41c8ff.gif]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to