I haven't tried it with packetfence, but LE works great for typical websites. It requires a public website, though, so if you're going to use it for your portal, the LE servers will need to be able to get to it.
On 2/15/17 12:19, Sallee, Jake wrote: > Hello All! > > My current captive portal cert is through Comodo, suddenly all kinds of > devices are very upset about this fact. > > Most mobile devices no longer trust my cert and now some desktop/laptop > systems are complaining as well. > > Since it looks like I will need to be replacing my cert I was wondering about > using Lets Encrypt. > > It looks like a really nice project and the cost is right up my alley! > > Is there any reason I should not use a LE cert? Anyone see a problem with > this path? > > Jake Sallee > Godfather of Bandwidth > System Engineer > University of Mary Hardin-Baylor > WWW.UMHB.EDU > > 900 College St. > Belton, Texas > 76513 > > Fone: 254-295-4658 > Phax: 254-295-4221 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > PacketFence-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users > -- --------------------------- Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold [email protected] --------------------------- "A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ PacketFence-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
