Hello Will,

it looks to be a sort of warning:

Wed Nov 21 15:01:01 2018 : Debug: (14)     if (Realm == "eduroam") {
Wed Nov 21 15:01:01 2018 : ERROR: (14)     Failed retrieving values required to evaluate condition

So Realm is empty in this case.

I don't think it will cause an issue.

Regards

Fabrice


Le 18-11-21 à 10 h 10, Will Halsall via PacketFence-users a écrit :

Hi Fabrice,

Have include the logs for user 00000...@farn-ct.ac.uk this test user had the same results.

Thanks

*From:*Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
*Sent:* 21 November 2018 14:44
*To:* packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
*Cc:* Fabrice Durand <fdur...@inverse.ca>
*Subject:* Re: [PacketFence-users] Eduroam local login

Hello Will,

it's not enough, i need to see the raddebug for this user.

Regards

Fabrice

Le 18-11-21 à 07 h 05, Will Halsall via PacketFence-users a écrit :

    Hi Fabrie,

    The patch worked fine and users can now authenticate with their
    userPrincilalName . the only thing to note is that there is one
    error in the radius Auth log entry as follows:

    Module-Failure-Message = "Failed retrieving values required to
    evaluate condition"

    SQL-User-Name = 20217...@farn-ct.ac.uk <mailto:20217...@farn-ct.ac.uk>

    Also  the node status in the audit log is N/A as follows:

    40:33:1a:47:ab:1e N/A   0 20217...@farn-ct.ac.uk
    <mailto:20217...@farn-ct.ac.uk>                              
    2018-11-21 11:42:14 172.16.36.30                 Wireles

    Thanks for your help

    WillH

    *From:*Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users
    <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
    <mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
    *Sent:* 20 November 2018 04:35
    *To:* packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
    <mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
    *Cc:* Durand fabrice <fdur...@inverse.ca> <mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca>
    *Subject:* Re: [PacketFence-users] Eduroam local login

    Hello Will,

    yes but it's not yet available in packetfence 8.2.

    If you want to test you can use the following PR
    https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/3429
    <https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/3429> :

    cd /usr/local/pf

    curl
    
https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/3429.diff
    | patch -p1 --dry-run

    If no error:

    curl
    
https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/3429.diff
    | patch -p1

    cp conf/radiusd/ldap_packetfence.conf.example
    conf/radiusd/ldap_packetfence.conf

    cp conf/radiusd/packetfence-tunnel.example
    conf/radiusd/packetfence-tunnel

    bin/pfcmd pfconfig clear_backend

    bin/pfcmd configreload hard

    bin/pfcmd service pf restart

    After that, check in the admin gui in the realm configuration and
    select the ldap source to use to resolve the samaccountname
    attribute, then edit the ldap authentication source to select the
    username attribute to resolve the samaccountname (userPrincipalName)

    So the logic will be the following, you will use the
    userPrincipalName attribute to authenticate
    (w.hals...@farn-ct.ac.uk <mailto:w.hals...@farn-ct.ac.uk> ) then
    freeradius will do a ldap search to find the samaccountname based
    on the userprincipalname=w.hals...@farn-ct.ac.uk
    <mailto:userprincipalname=w.hals...@farn-ct.ac.uk> and do a
    ntlm_auth with the result of the search.

    The last thing will be to use an ldap source (clone the previous
    one if needed) and use userPrincipalName as the user attribute to
    create some rules (role/access duration)

    Regards

    Fabrice

    Le 18-11-19 à 09 h 03, Will Halsall via PacketFence-users a écrit :

        Hi Fabrice,

        Thankyou yes that now works if I use the
        <sAMAccountName>@farn-ct.ac.uk
        <mailto:samaccountn...@farn-ct.ac.uk>

        Can I modify this to use the userPrincipalName (mail address)
        w.hals...@farn-ct.ac.uk <mailto:w.hals...@farn-ct.ac.uk> by
        either using ldap or using ldap with a filter to retrieve the
        sAMAccountName

        Thanks

        Will H

        *From:*Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users
        <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
        <mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
        *Sent:* 14 November 2018 20:08
        *To:* packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
        <mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
        *Cc:* Fabrice Durand <fdur...@inverse.ca>
        <mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca>
        *Subject:* Re: [PacketFence-users] Eduroam local login

        Hello Will,

        i think it's because the username is not stripped on the
        ntlm_auth call.

        Can you strip it in the farn-ct-ac-uk realm config ?

        It's like that right now:

        realm farn-ct.ac.uk {
             nostrip
        }

        Regards

        Fabrice

        Le 18-11-14 à 11 h 34, Will Halsall via PacketFence-users a
        écrit :

            Hi Folks

            I have configured a Eduroam Exclusive Source and the
            access point but am able to login a local user. I have
            included the radius eduroam debug logs. Would it be
            possible for someone to have a look to see if they can
            spot what I am doing wrong

            Thanks

            Will Halsall

            <https://www.farn-ct.ac.uk/about/Events>

            This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) to
            whom it is addressed, and may contain privileged and
            confidential information.
            If it has come to you in error, please contact the sender
            as soon as possible,
            and note that you must take no action based on the
            content, nor must you copy,
            distribute, or show the content to any other person.


            In accordance with its legal obligations, Farnborough
            College of
            Technology reserves the right to monitor the content of
            e-mails sent and
            received, but will not do so routinely.






            _______________________________________________

            PacketFence-users mailing list

            PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net  
<mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>

            https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

--
        Fabrice Durand

        fdur...@inverse.ca  <mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca>  ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) 
::www.inverse.ca  <http://www.inverse.ca>

        Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and 
PacketFence (http://packetfence.org)





        _______________________________________________

        PacketFence-users mailing list

        PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net  
<mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>

        https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users




    _______________________________________________

    PacketFence-users mailing list

    PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net  
<mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>

    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

--
Fabrice Durand
fdur...@inverse.ca  <mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca>  ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) 
::www.inverse.ca  <http://www.inverse.ca>
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(http://packetfence.org)


_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to