Hello Fabrice, Thank you for your reply.
Is that still the case with PF 9.1 or will that be solved ? Regards, carlos Am Mi., 30. Okt. 2019 um 01:52 Uhr schrieb Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users <[email protected]>: > Hello Carlos, > > in fact it's because in pf v9 we still keep the old admin gui and for that > we need to have httpd.admin running. > > So you can decrease the number of httpd.admin server if needed ( > httpd.admin.tt file) and disable some useless services. > > Regards > > Fabrice > > > Le 19-10-28 à 09 h 45, Carlos Wetli via PacketFence-users a écrit : > > Hello, > > Our installation of packetfence (Version 9.0) is using more then 93% of > the memory which has been set to 16 GB following the recommendations (12 > GB) for version 9.0. We could also see that the memory consumption > increased quite a lot within two stage (first stage from 5.02 GB to 9.3GB > and second stage one week later from 10.25 to 15.51 GB). > > We could also see that the we are running 11 Processes of > /usr/sbin/httpd-f/usr/local/pf/var/conf/httpd.conf.d/httpd.admin-DFOREGROUND. > Theses processes are using 4.6 GB of memory. > > questions: > - should 16GB of memory be sufficient to run packetfence (Galera-DB and HA > for authentication only, no captive portal, no DHCP ...) > > Yes > > - Is it normal that the httpd.admin processes have a such need of memory ? > - Can this been optimized / tuned ? > > Many thanks in advance for any reply on that matter. > Regards, > Carlos > > > _______________________________________________ > PacketFence-users mailing > [email protected]https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users > > _______________________________________________ > PacketFence-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users >
_______________________________________________ PacketFence-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
