Is it normal for PF to think the location for all devices is the Ruckus ZD1100 Network Controller?
When I had this set up in the lab it was identifying clients as connected to the MAC address of the AP. Now I’m getting showing the clients location as attached the IP of the network controller. > On Sep 13, 2020, at 2:35 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > Hi, > > I’m having trouble getting the captive portal to work correctly with Ruckus > APs. > > Guests can connect and get the captive portal but never get network access > enabled. > > Packetfence does show the device as registered and if I disconnect from the > guest WiFi and then reconnect I can access the internet. > > The following warning keeps appearing in the packetfence log > > packetfence pfqueue: pfqueue(2680) WARN: [mac:58:d9:c3:5e:56:e5] Unable to > perform RADIUS Disconnect-Request. Disconnect-NAK received with Error-Cause: > Session-Context-Not-Found. (pf::Switch::radiusDisconnect) > > A full copy of log output from when a guest connects to the wifi and my > switches.conf are attached. > > > Thanks, > > Chris > > > <switches.conf.txt><Packetfence.log>
_______________________________________________ PacketFence-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
