No DHCP, no provisioner.

Thanks,

Ludovic Zammit
lzam...@inverse.ca <mailto:lzam...@inverse.ca> ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x145) ::  
www.inverse.ca <https://www.inverse.ca/>
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu <http://www.sogo.nu/>) 
and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org <http://packetfence.org/>)







> On Feb 26, 2021, at 11:52 AM, NITISH AGGARWAL <nitishag.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I donot have DHCP server installed, no provisioning for DHCP. It's all static 
> ip.
> 
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2021, 22:21 Ludovic Zammit <lzam...@inverse.ca 
> <mailto:lzam...@inverse.ca>> wrote:
> Does PF receives DHCP ACK from the production DHCP server ?
> 
> Did you install the DHCP sensor ?
> 
> https://www.packetfence.org/doc/PacketFence_Installation_Guide.html#_microsoft_dhcp_sensor
>  
> <https://www.packetfence.org/doc/PacketFence_Installation_Guide.html#_microsoft_dhcp_sensor>
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ludovic Zammit
> lzam...@inverse.ca <mailto:lzam...@inverse.ca> ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x145) ::  
> www.inverse.ca <https://www.inverse.ca/>
> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu 
> <http://www.sogo.nu/>) and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org 
> <http://packetfence.org/>)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Feb 26, 2021, at 11:44 AM, NITISH AGGARWAL <nitishag.i...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:nitishag.i...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> As such there is no restriction on when to check for provisioning although I 
>> have selected option of checking after registration of device.
>> 
>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2021, 22:11 Ludovic Zammit <lzam...@inverse.ca 
>> <mailto:lzam...@inverse.ca>> wrote:
>> Provisioner workflow are triggered by DHCP traffic seen from the Production 
>> or Registration networks.
>> 
>> When do you want to check if Symantec is installed ?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Ludovic Zammit
>> lzam...@inverse.ca <mailto:lzam...@inverse.ca> ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x145) :: 
>>  www.inverse.ca <https://www.inverse.ca/>
>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu 
>> <http://www.sogo.nu/>) and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org 
>> <http://packetfence.org/>)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Feb 26, 2021, at 11:40 AM, NITISH AGGARWAL <nitishag.i...@gmail.com 
>>> <mailto:nitishag.i...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Yes....as I connects the device it went into registration vlan and then if 
>>> it is in domain it gets authenticated and vlan changes as per switch.
>>> 
>>> Dot1x is working fine...but problem is with Symantec. How to check if end 
>>> device has Symantec client installed and working.
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2021, 22:07 Ludovic Zammit <lzam...@inverse.ca 
>>> <mailto:lzam...@inverse.ca>> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> 
>>> Your devices that connect on PF are statically IP addressed?
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Ludovic Zammit
>>> lzam...@inverse.ca <mailto:lzam...@inverse.ca> ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x145) 
>>> ::  www.inverse.ca <https://www.inverse.ca/>
>>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu 
>>> <http://www.sogo.nu/>) and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org 
>>> <http://packetfence.org/>)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Feb 25, 2021, at 9:55 AM, NITISH AGGARWAL via PacketFence-users 
>>>> <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net 
>>>> <mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> I have setup PacketFence zen as per guide. I can see dot1x authentication 
>>>> working with MSCHAPv2 auth, so non domain users are not getting access, 
>>>> which is required. I am using auto-registration in connection profile.
>>>> 
>>>> Second, I have to check for Symantec in my endpoints. I have setup SEPM 
>>>> provisioning as per document. During authentication, I can see security 
>>>> event generated for provisioning on my node in PacketFence but my end 
>>>> device got access to intranet no matter symantec installed on it or not.
>>>> 
>>>> I have tried everything I could. I need some help in this case. I am using 
>>>> static ips and cisco 2960. 
>>>> 
>>>> I need devices to be registered if they have both domain connected and 
>>>> SEPM installed.
>>>> 
>>>> Any help will be appreciated. Thanks in advance...
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>>> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net 
>>>> <mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users 
>>>> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users>
>>> 
>> 
> 

_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to