Hello,

It’s a hard one, PF has trouble handling multiple self service portals because 
of a race condition.

You can try to create a URI filter on your wanted connection profile that is 
either /status or /device-registration

Thanks,

Ludovic Zammit
Product Support Engineer Principal

Cell: +1.613.670.8432
Akamai Technologies - Inverse
145 Broadway
Cambridge, MA 02142
Connect with Us:         <https://community.akamai.com/>  
<http://blogs.akamai.com/>  <https://twitter.com/akamai>  
<http://www.facebook.com/AkamaiTechnologies>  
<http://www.linkedin.com/company/akamai-technologies>  
<http://www.youtube.com/user/akamaitechnologies?feature=results_main>

> On Mar 4, 2022, at 1:00 PM, Toren Smith via PacketFence-users 
> <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> 
> I asked about this earlier, but I wanted to double-check after doing
> more testing.
> 
> I've successfully set up separate self-registration portals for our
> different user groups by putting the second portal on a separate
> interface, and setting up a connection profile that filters on the
> FQDN of the secondary portal. When I do that, the second portal
> successfully presents the device role list that's specified in the
> secondary connection profile instead of the default. However, it
> doesn't matter what I set the authentication source to on the
> secondary connection profile -- that portal will always use the
> authentication source of the default connection profile instead.
> 
> Is this how things are supposed to work, or is this a bug? It's very
> close to being what I need, but if the two portals always use the same
> authentication source, there's no point to having more than one.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users__;!!GjvTz_vk!FqWWeSsfxMHcAtrnUMm8Rgl7G8i5k8egBllcdEBa-o38ep0zZPyLI8myulRTpBrJ$
>  

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to