it's the tcp fingerprinting , each packet is scanned. Le mer. 29 janv. 2025 à 10:19, Rein van ‘t Veer via PacketFence-users < packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> a écrit :
> That definitely changed the cpu usage. > > Now it is down to 1-5%. > > What does this exactly? What did I just disable feature wise? > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 29 Jan 2025, at 00.23, Fabrice Durand <oeufd...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello, > it depends on what the fingerbank-collector is facing as traffic. > > You can try that to reduce the cpu usage > > # systemctl edit packetfence-fingerbank-collector.service > > In the editor that opens, add: > > [Service] > Environment=COLLECTOR_DISABLE_TCP_HANDLER=true > > Close the editor, then do: > > # systemctl daemon-reload > # systemctl restart packetfence-fingerbank-collector > > Regards > Fabrice > > Le mar. 28 janv. 2025 à 17:45, rein--- via PacketFence-users < > packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> a écrit : > >> Hi, >> >> I've been using packetfence for a few years now and am very happy for all >> it brings to the table 😉. >> >> One question I have had for a while now is what the normal cpu usage for >> the fingerbank-collector is. >> It has always been the process with the highest load on my (standalone) >> server even though my users aren't that dynamic. >> >> Anyone whom can shed some light on this? >> >> See screenshot for reference >> >> <image.png> >> _______________________________________________ >> PacketFence-users mailing list >> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users >> > _______________________________________________ > PacketFence-users mailing list > PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users >
_______________________________________________ PacketFence-users mailing list PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
