Am Dienstag, 13. Januar 2009 schrieb Cristian Morales Vega: > openSUSE 11.1 provides both the old openal from http://www.openal.org/ > and the new openal-soft from http://kcat.strangesoft.net/openal.html, > but by default uses openal-soft. Because of this funguloids fails to > start. > To fix it the patch from > http://funguloids.sourceforge.net/alc_error.patch needs to be applied.
webpin openal-soft -d11.0 7 results (4 packages) found for "openal-soft" in openSUSE_110 * openal-soft: OpenAL Soft - 1.2.218 [BS::home:/ickruis] - 1.6.372 [BS::home:/b-s-a | BS::home:/lnussel:/ioquake3] * openal-soft-devel: OpenAL Soft development files - 1.6.372 [BS::home:/b-s-a | BS::home:/lnussel:/ioquake3] * openal-soft-debuginfo: Debug information for package openal-soft - 1.6.372 [BS::home:/b-s-a] * openal-soft-debugsource: Debug sources for package openal-soft - 1.6.372 [BS::home:/b-s-a] so openal-soft is not in a official repository ... and so I don't need the patch, if you look in the spec-file the patch is tested and ready for build, but as openal-soft is in no official repos I removed it. openal is a "Requires" in funguloids but if openal-soft is providing also openal this is not correct if the api is not equal.... > Also, the package requires Cg, freealut, mad, ogre, ogre-plugin-Cg and > openal. - ogre-plugin-Cg already provides Cg, so directly requiring it only > adds work to zypper. I prefer to name exactly the requires per package. So I'm not depending on the right Requires of other packages. And it takes some extra work to check every time if a package is requireing already other packages. > - The package already requires libalut.so.0, so no need for a freealut > require. Also avoids the posibility of use alternative implementations > of ALUT... even if I don't think they exist. that's exactly the reason: I want to use freealut. > - There is also a require of libmad.so.0, so no direct mad require is > needed. - There is also a require of libOgreMain-1.6.0.so, so no direct > ogre require is needed. mad is not needed, this will be corrected > - There is also a require of libopenal.so.0, so no direct openal > require is needed. of course, because I want to force exactly the openal package > - The OBS Games repo names "ogre-plugin-Cg" as "libogre1_6-plugin-Cg". > No that one is better than the other (I don't think shlib packaging > policy applies to it, even if it applies to ogre itself), but it would > be good if the funguloids from Packman worked with the > libogre1_6-plugin-Cg from Games. CCing Pavol Rusnak since he is the > ogre package bugowner in OBS. I've provided Cg much longer than the OBS, so why should I follow always "someones" naming ideas in some repositories ? The plugin has no so-name, so it needs not to be named according shared library policy. its a plugin not a shared library > When fixing this note that the ogre-plugin-Cg only provides the > /usr/lib64/OGRE/Plugin_CgProgramManager.so file. Isn't installed in > /usr/lib64/OGRE-1.6 but in /usr/lib64/OGRE... so isn't parallel > installable with other versions anyway. the plugin always depend directly to the underlying master package. -- have fun Toni _______________________________________________ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman