On 2010-12-31 13:48:49 (+0100), Marcel Gmür <pack...@ammler.ch> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Pascal Bleser > <pascal.ble...@opensuse.org> wrote: > > On 2010-12-31 01:43:22 (+0100), Marcel Gmür <pack...@ammler.ch> wrote: > >> You could also "safe" some build power by simply not building > >> packages, which are already built and maintained at obs, e.g. I had > >> some zypper dup issues with p7zip or some games like openttd. Are > >> those 2 packages really the only ones? > > > > Oh, no, there are many more than those. > > > > There are basically two "positions" on that: > > 1) yes, you're right, it's pointless and there is much more build power > > on build.o.o (also a lot more packagers though ;)) > > 2) we had those packages first, it's not ours to remove, and the people > > who are using the packman repository also use packman because of those > > (and only want to add one big repository instead of a dozen of > > repositories from build.o.o) > > both points are valid, I jsut suggested it according to the lack of > build power. Maybe the obs worker could build for packman too, if > those are idle?
No, that's not possible, unfortunately. > about the splitting, will you be able to get all different repos > listed on the yast community repos list? Yes, I can edit that list. > I would also propose a repo for server/network (torrents/monitoring etc.) Maybe, we I think that we all agree that we don't want an extreme granularity either (keep it at 3 or 4 repositories, and not a dozen ;)). cheers -- -o) Pascal Bleser <pascal.ble...@opensuse.org> /\\ http://opensuse.org -- I took the green pill _\_v FOSDEM XI: 5 + 6 Feb 2011, http://fosdem.org
pgpsBnBqVoaaG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
