On 2012-04-05 14:06:12 (+0100), Cristian Morales Vega <reddw...@opensuse.org> wrote: > On 5 April 2012 08:16, Pascal Bleser <pascal.ble...@opensuse.org> wrote: > > Hence I had to package a few things only for SLE_11, SLE-11-SP2, > > and sometimes for Evergreen_11.1 or 11.2 in order to have all > > the dependencies (those packages are named libxxx-for-sle or > > libxxx-for-older-than-11.4, etc... in Essentials).
> libmatroska-for-older-than-11.4, libebml-for-older-than-11.4, > lash-for-sle and fluidsynth-for-sle were building against *every* > version. I disabled the build to what I understood the name meant > ("older-than-11.4" includes both SLE_11 and SLE-11-SP2?) and wiped the > binaries. Yeah, I wrongly assumed that the meta in the branch would also be transferred through SRs, but they don't. Forgot to check and disable the in Essentials as well, thanks. > Unrelated... why are we building against both SLE_11 and SLE-11-SP2? > Every binary compiled against SLE_11 should work with SLE-11-SP2. Does it? I mean, really? SLE-11-SP2 ships different libs and different versions of libs so ... -- -o) Pascal Bleser /\\ http://opensuse.org -- we haz green _\_v http://fosdem.org -- we haz conf
pgpZj2qfZK2Ey.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman