On 8 July 2012 15:36, David Haller <[email protected]> wrote: > Hallo, > > Am Sun, 08 Jul 2012, Cristian Morales Vega schrieb: >>Would not make more sense to: >> >>a) Only build it for 11.4 since the other distributions already >>provide quvi in the default repos > > Even factory and multimedia:libs have no current versions and we need > an up to date quvi/libquvi/libquvi-scripts for clive and cclive. And
OK. I was looking at the "BuildRequires: libquvi-devel >= 0.2.0" line from cclive.spec. I see from configure.ac that it's actually >= 0.4.0. In such a case I have no problem with it being build for 12.1. > cclive is not in any repo I can find ATM with software.o.o, and with > 'osc se' I only find a 26months old 0.6.2 version in > openSUSE11.4:Contrib (and e.g. YT has changed stuff since then at > least twice). You can submit it to the main openSUSE repo ;-) IMHO for .*quvi.* it makes more sense to submit an update to multimedia:libs and, if cclive is in Packman, just link to multimedia:libs from Packman. Now Packman will have an updated version but openSUSE will be released with an outdated quvi. But it would not be he first case... _______________________________________________ Packman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
