----- Olaf Hering <o...@aepfle.de> a écrit :
> Am Tue, 1 Dec 2020 10:56:20 +0100 (CET)
> schrieb Guillaume GARDET <guillaume.gar...@free.fr>:
> 
> > Any objections?
> 
> The publisher may need adjustments, perhaps it has a fixed list of 
> architectures.

No, currently mirrors take care of projects and repos only and that's why 
adding new architectures to openSUSE_Tumbleweed will just work, whereas nobody 
took care to add openSUSE_Factory_ARM in the past.

> 
> It also means all 'openSUSE_Factory_ARM' *.repo files out there become 
> invalid. The published directory may stay on the mirrors, unless someone 
> removes it manually and the mirrors pickup this change.

No, it is not part of the mirrors, which was the original reason for this 
change.

Cheers,
Guillaume

> 
> A number of pkg's may need adjustment in case they have special handling for 
> a 'openSUSE_Factory_ARM' repository, but not for 'openSUSE_Tumbleweed' or 
> 'arch='. Each one should probably be reevaluated if such knob is still 
> justified.
> 
> Olaf


_______________________________________________
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
https://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman

Antwort per Email an