----- Olaf Hering <o...@aepfle.de> a écrit : > Am Tue, 1 Dec 2020 10:56:20 +0100 (CET) > schrieb Guillaume GARDET <guillaume.gar...@free.fr>: > > > Any objections? > > The publisher may need adjustments, perhaps it has a fixed list of > architectures.
No, currently mirrors take care of projects and repos only and that's why adding new architectures to openSUSE_Tumbleweed will just work, whereas nobody took care to add openSUSE_Factory_ARM in the past. > > It also means all 'openSUSE_Factory_ARM' *.repo files out there become > invalid. The published directory may stay on the mirrors, unless someone > removes it manually and the mirrors pickup this change. No, it is not part of the mirrors, which was the original reason for this change. Cheers, Guillaume > > A number of pkg's may need adjustment in case they have special handling for > a 'openSUSE_Factory_ARM' repository, but not for 'openSUSE_Tumbleweed' or > 'arch='. Each one should probably be reevaluated if such knob is still > justified. > > Olaf _______________________________________________ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de https://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman