On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 08:58:17PM +0100, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote: > Hi, > looking for advise on how to deal with an unpleasant situation: > Look at the handbrake TW build right now:have choice for > libvulkan.so.1()(64bit) needed by libavutil56_70: libvulkan1 obs-studio, have > choice for libvulkan.so.1()(64bit) needed by libavfilter7_110: libvulkan1 > obs-studio > and indeed from the obs-studio build: > [ 542s] -- Installing: > /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/obs-studio-28.1.1-0.x86_64/usr/lib64/obs-plugins/libvulkan.so.1 > [ 556s] Processing files: obs-studio-28.1.1-0.x86_64[ 557s] Provides: > application() application(com.obsproject.Studio.desktop) libEGL.so()(64bit) > libGLESv2.so()(64bit) libcef.so()(64bit) libobs-frontend-api.so.0()(64bit) > libobs-opengl.so.1()(64bit) libobs-scripting.so.1()(64bit) > libobs.so.0()(64bit) libobsglad.so.1()(64bit) libvk_swiftshader.so()(64bit) > libvulkan.so.1()(64bit) metainfo() > metainfo(com.obsproject.Studio.appdata.xml) obs-studio = 28.1.1-0 > obs-studio(x86-64) = 28.1.1-0 > Due to the automatic dependency processing, obs-studio now provides a > libvulkan.so.1 plugin, which in turn provides libvulkan.so.1()(64bit) on the > package, which is kind of silly of course. Sure, this could be solved by > within prjconf with: > Prefer: libvulkan1 > but I would rather like to remove this provides from obs-studio build > specifically. Any idea, how to achieve that?
Add in the spec file something like: %define __provides_exclude ^(libvulcan\\.so.*|libEGL\\.so.*)$ Check the documantation here: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/AutoProvidesAndRequiresFiltering/ Regards, Giacomo > Cheers,Pete--Life without chameleons is possible, but pointless. > > > > _______________________________________________Packman mailing > listPackman@links2linux.dehttps://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman _______________________________________________ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de https://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
