Hi Steven, On Sat, 20 May 2023, 21:08:14 +0200, Steven Swart wrote: > Just had a thought, Manfred - would it be worth publishing this issue on the > forums? Just in case anyone else out there runs into the same problem? > > In which case, rather you do it than me. I am not sure if I would get it > right...
TBH, I really don't like forums - perhaps I'm too old for that. The issue really is about having arbitrary repos enabled which are not thought for a daily use - this is why they are called "devel" repos. When you use such repo, you are on your own to ensure you know the implications. If someone would write this up properly, I certainly wouldn't be against it - it's just not me! > Kind regards, > Steven. Cheers. l8er manfred > On Sat, 20 May 2023, 21:04 Manfred Hollstein <manfre...@gmx.net> wrote: > > On Sat, 20 May 2023, 20:43:44 +0200, Steven Swart wrote: > > Thank you for your feedback as well, Manfred, I will do as you advise. > > Just checked if the newly built packages have a direct dependency on > libfmt9 - they don't :( Since libfmt appears to be only required by > *some* addons, adding a hard "Require: libfmt9" would punish all users > of addons which don't actually need libfmt at all. I'm now going to > remove the "BuildRequire: ..." again, as it does not solve your problem. > > Please check all packages you have installed from the devel:* > repos/projects!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de https://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman