Dan McGee wrote: >> >> - --) OPT_IND=0; shift; break;; >> + --) OPT_IND=0; continue; break;; > Is it just me, or does this make no sense at all (continue followed by > break)? And the problem now is our $@ is not properly shifted for this > flag to even do anything. >
Yeah, I noticed this funny continue; break thing, but then I guess I got disturbed trying to find out what OPT_IND was and failing. >> *) usage; exit 1 ;; # E_INVALID_OPTION >> esac >> - shift >> done >> >> if [ "$HOLDVER" = "1" -a "$FORCE_VER" != "" ]; then >> -- > I guess I'm thinking this is a well-intentioned patch, but should we > try to attack the faulty $@ problem instead? > Agreed, that was exactly my sentiment. Before finding a workaround, please try to find more about what the issue actually is. Try to write a simple testcase reproducing the problem. _______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
